• Forum
  • Rules
*
Search:  
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Calendar
  • Login
  • Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 05, 2010, 09:15:27 AM

Login with username, password and session length
CEEMIT Forums > Community IT Resource Recommendations > Community IT Hardware & Software Reviews > Flip Video Ultra HD Engadget.com Review
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Flip Video Ultra HD Engadget.com Review  (Read 224 times)
Jon V.
Supreme Chancellor Overlord of Information Technology
Godfather
Teamster (Local 810)
*****

Special Snowflake: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 185



View Profile WWW Email
Flip Video Ultra HD Engadget.com Review
« on: February 25, 2010, 09:44:39 AM »

Site:
Engadget.com Review
http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/flip-video-ultra-hd-video-review/

The review includes a formal pros and cons and also test video.

My Comments:
I just had a question from Marty about the flip video camera.  I actually received one of these cameras as a present recently. In my case, I already had a camera that took photos and HD videos, so we returned it.  I personally didn’t like the fact that I could only take video with it, but the video and sound was impressive for the price.

Pros
simple camera
HD quality video, 720
inexpensive
small and easy to carry
You will not cry too much if you lose it

Cons
Not full 1080p HD resolution (only 720, but not bad)
No Pictures, only video
Does not track action shots very well.

Check out the review for more details.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2010, 09:46:42 AM by Jon V. » Logged

I purposely place mistakes in my posts just for the people that look for them...
---
Free Departmental IT Resources:
-Microsoft
-Antivrius
-AutoCAD
-Tutorials
http://ceemit.org/forums/index.php?board=53.0
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Scribbles design by Bloc | XHTML | CSS
Page created in 0.504 seconds with 18 queries.
Loading...